Investigate new Z veto implementations
Introduction
- New Z veto implementations:
- form track collection from all tracks which are isolated (track isolation like for electrons) and fulfill minimal quality requirements (nHits > 7, pT > 1.0)
- Modus 1: combine selected tracks with ll and lt if opposite sign, ΔR > 0.1 and Δz < 0.5, if invariant mass is within Z mass window, reject event
- Modus 2: combine 2 tracks from selected tracks if opposite sign, ΔR > 0.1 and Δz < 0.5, if invariant mass is within Z mass window, reject event
- Modus 3: Modus 1 OR Modus 2
For
SumEt comparisons limit plots and numbers to Modus 1 only, as this cut is the dominating one and to avoid proliferation of numbers
Compare all 3 modi for BaseLine selection
baseline |
SM |
reduction % |
LM1 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM2 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM4 |
reduction % |
S/B |
plain |
17948.00 |
0.00 |
884.30 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
89.80 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
434.90 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
modus 1 |
10245.70 |
0.43 |
491.20 |
0.44 |
0.05 |
43.30 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
172.40 |
0.60 |
0.02 |
modus 2 |
14647.60 |
0.18 |
614.10 |
0.31 |
0.04 |
57.70 |
0.36 |
0.00 |
273.40 |
0.37 |
0.02 |
modus 3 |
10125.20 |
0.44 |
462.00 |
0.48 |
0.05 |
40.50 |
0.55 |
0.00 |
165.20 |
0.62 |
0.02 |
- Sm background reduction ~40 % and LM reduction ~50-60 %
- S/B almost not changed
Compare all 3 modi for met 10 selection
met 10 |
SM |
reduction % |
LM1 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM2 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM4 |
reduction % |
S/B |
plain |
1430.20 |
0.00 |
707.90 |
0.00 |
0.49 |
76.90 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
337.10 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
modus 1 |
815.70 |
0.43 |
379.40 |
0.46 |
0.47 |
35.90 |
0.53 |
0.04 |
129.00 |
0.62 |
0.16 |
modus 2 |
1120.30 |
0.22 |
480.40 |
0.32 |
0.43 |
47.40 |
0.38 |
0.04 |
209.20 |
0.38 |
0.19 |
modus 3 |
793.20 |
0.45 |
354.10 |
0.50 |
0.45 |
33.40 |
0.57 |
0.04 |
123.30 |
0.63 |
0.16 |
- SM background reduction ~45% and LM reduction ~50-60 %
- S/B minimal changes (LM1) to getting worse (LM4)
Compare modus 1 for sumEt 10 selection
sumEt 10 |
SM |
reduction % |
LM1 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM2 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM4 |
reduction % |
S/B |
ALL LM |
reduction % |
S/B |
plain |
1401.4 |
0 |
442.8 |
0 |
0.32 |
46.5 |
0 |
0.03 |
245.7 |
0 |
0.18 |
735 |
0 |
0.52 |
modus 1 |
813.5 |
0.42 |
376.9 |
0.15 |
0.46 |
33.7 |
0.28 |
0.04 |
139 |
0.43 |
0.17 |
549.6 |
0.25 |
0.68 |
- SM background reduction 42% and LM reduction ~25 %
- S/B changed from 0.3 to 0.5 (LM1) or, the physically meaningless sum of LMx from 0.5 to 0.7
Full standard tables for all modi at [[IngoBlochSandbox][Ingo's sandbox]
Compare all 3 modi for met 1 selection
met 1 |
SM |
reduction % |
LM1 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM2 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM4 |
reduction % |
S/B |
plain |
244.00 |
0.00 |
504.90 |
0.00 |
2.07 |
58.30 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
226.40 |
0.00 |
0.93 |
modus 1 |
110.90 |
0.55 |
266.90 |
0.47 |
2.41 |
26.40 |
0.55 |
0.24 |
85.20 |
0.62 |
0.77 |
modus 2 |
176.60 |
0.28 |
336.50 |
0.33 |
1.91 |
35.20 |
0.40 |
0.20 |
138.20 |
0.39 |
0.78 |
modus 3 |
105.90 |
0.57 |
249.60 |
0.51 |
2.36 |
24.40 |
0.58 |
0.23 |
80.40 |
0.64 |
0.76 |
- SM background reduction ~60% and LM reduction ~50-60%
- S/B minimal changes (LM1) to getting worse (LM4)
Compare modus 1 for sumEt 1 selection
sumEt 10 |
SM |
reduction % |
LM1 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM2 |
reduction % |
S/B |
LM4 |
reduction % |
S/B |
ALL LM |
reduction % |
S/B |
plain |
156.1 |
0 |
161.6 |
0 |
1.04 |
18.3 |
0 |
0.12 |
97.2 |
0 |
0.62 |
277.1 |
0 |
1.78 |
modus 1 |
74.8 |
0.52 |
132 |
0.18 |
1.76 |
15.8 |
0.14 |
0.21 |
58 |
0.4 |
0.78 |
205.8 |
0.26 |
2.75 |
- SM background reduction 52% and LM reduction 4-18 %
- S/B changed from 1.0 to 1.8 (LM1) or, the physically meaningless sum of LMx from 1.8 to 2.8
Full standard tables for all modi at [[IngoBlochSandbox][Ingo's sandbox]
Comparison plots baseline (left) vs. baseline && modus 3 (right)
Comparison plots met 10 (left) vs. met 10 && modus 3 (right)
Comparison plots sumEt 10 (left) vs. sumEt 10 && modus 1 (right)
Comparison plots met 1 (left) vs. met 1 && modus 3 (right)
Comparison plots sumEt 1 (left) vs. sumEt 1 && modus 1 (right)
All plots (pdf)