Difference:
OliverGutscheElsChargeMisidentificationOtherStudies
(1 vs. 2)
Revision 2
19 Jul 2009 - Main.OliverGutsche
Line: 1 to 1
META TOPICPARENT
name="OliverGutsche"
Studies of Electron Charge Misidentification by other people
Line: 31 to 31
Measurement of wrong charge reconstruction probability of electrons from data
http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=2&materialId=slides&confId=53366
interesting
Added:
>
>
Update 090719
Boris Mangano: "Recent investigations on electron charge mis-measurement"
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=44569
2 reasons why tracking does not reconstruct the electron but rather one of the conversion legs
SeedCleaning
: already used seed is not retried so the prompt electron is missed
TrajectoryCleaning
: hit sharing >= 50%, shorter track or track with higher chi2/ndof is discarded
Broutin
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=0&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=62527
old methods from above
majority method:
if q
in
agrees with q
out
, ok
if not, supercluster method: delta phi between seed and supercluster barycenter: take sign relative to axis:
variables to look at
sign of delta phi between super cluster barycenter and seed relative to axis beamspot-first hit on electron track
Revision 1
15 May 2009 - Main.OliverGutsche
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT
name="OliverGutsche"
Studies of Electron Charge Misidentification by other people
compare monoclusters/multiclusters
1 cluster: simple electron
2 clusters: electron + photon
>2 clusters: more complication
studies at pT = 35
GeV
(
RelVal
sample, what a surprise)
http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=3&materialId=slides&confId=50970
curvature of track: 2.5% misidentification
delta phi between seed and supercluster barycenter: take sign relative to axis:
axis: seed tangent at vertex: 2.14% misidentification
axis: beamspot -> first hit on electron track: 1.69% misidentification
direction of P
out
: extrapolate last hit to ecal, take sign of φ
ext
- φ
out
: 4.74% misidentification
only for mono clusters: 1.76% misidentification
only for multi clusters: 7.44% misidentification
very track purity dependent
for monocluster, combine correlated to fBrem:
take standard (1.75% misidentification) for fBrem < 0.34
take supercluster 2 (0.86%) for fBrem > 0.34
combined 0.69% misidentification
charge significance method (not clear what this is)
ideas for new methods for multicluster electrons based on:
comparison of different clusters
position of the cluster of initial electron wrt to the other sub clusters
data driven method for electron-charge misidentification
http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=0&materialId=slides&confId=52580
most interesting variables used in TMVA methods (amongst others)
skewness of supercluster hits in φ, very sensitive to fBrem
not very discriminating on its own, weight with exp(1/fBrem)
φ
innermost
-φ
seed
Measurement of wrong charge reconstruction probability of electrons from data
http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=2&materialId=slides&confId=53366
interesting
variables to look at
sign of delta phi between super cluster barycenter and seed relative to axis beamspot-first hit on electron track
modified skewness
View topic
|
H
istory
:
r2
<
r1
|
More topic actions...
Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback